HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES NEWS

This Week in 340B: October 21 – 27, 2025

by Emily Jane Cook, Matthew David, Abygail Hoey and Sydney Merritt Martinez | Oct 30, 2025 | Uncategorized

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other

In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
In one case by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Maine state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, an Amici brief was filed in support of defendants’ opposition to plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction.
In one case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the insurance company filed an answer to the covered entity’s complaint.

This Week in 340B: October 14 – 20, 2025

by Emily Jane Cook, Matthew David, Abygail Hoey, Margaret Houtz, Sydney Merritt Martinez and Nadine Tejadilla | Oct 23, 2025 | 340B

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Rebate Models; Other

In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Tennessee state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant filed a response to the plaintiff’s notice of supplemental authority, and in another similar case, a group of amici filed an amicus brief in support of defendant’s motion to dismiss.
In [three] consolidated appealed cases related to rebate models, the plaintiff-appellants filed an unopposed motion to unseal a portion of the administrative record.
In one case brought by a trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Hawaii state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendant filed a memorandum in opposition to the plaintiff’s [...]

Continue Reading

This Week in 340B: October 7 –13, 2025

by Emily Jane Cook, Reuben Bank, Matthew David, Jae Hyun Lee, Deepika Raj and Kelsey Reinhardt | Oct 16, 2025 | 340B

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other

In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendants filed their answer.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Missouri state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff-appellant filed their reply brief.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oklahoma state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
In one case brought by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Rhode Island state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Maine state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court granted the parties’ motion to stay pending resolution of the plaintiff’s appeal.
In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, a group of amici filed a supplemental amicus curiae brief in support [...]

Continue Reading

This Week in 340B: September 30 – October 6, 2025

by Emily Jane Cook, Reuben Bank, Matthew David and Kelsey Reinhardt | Oct 8, 2025 | 340B

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy

In four cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Utah, two plaintiffs filed a response to the government’s notice of supplemental authority, one plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority, and one defendant filed a notice of supplemental authority in support of their motion to dismiss.
In a case by a drug manufacturer challenging an Arkansas state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court denied the intervenor-defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
A trade association for drug manufacturers filed a cases in Oregon and a case in Rhode Island to challenge state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
A drug manufacturer filed a case in Maine and a case in Oklahoma to challenge state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
In one case by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
In one case by a trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Colorado state law [...]

Continue Reading

This Week in 340B: September 23 – 29, 2025

by Emily Jane Cook, Reuben Bank, Matthew David, Jae Hyun Lee, Deepika Raj and Kelsey Reinhardt | Oct 1, 2025 | 340B

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; HRSA Audit Process; Other

In two cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Nebraska, the defendant filed a supplemental reply to plaintiff’s response in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
In a case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Missouri, amici filed a supplemental brief in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss, defendants filed a reply memorandum in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss, and proposed intervenors filed reply suggestions in support of proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene.
In three cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Maine, one plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction and in two cases, the court denied each plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and each plaintiff appealed the decision.
In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Colorado, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Rhode Island, the plaintiff filed [...]

Continue Reading