HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES NEWS
HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES NEWS
Exploring critical business and legal issues across the healthcare and life sciences industries
HEALTH & LIFE SCIENCES NEWS
Exploring critical business and legal issues across the healthcare and life sciences industries

This Week in 340B: October 7 –13, 2025

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other

  • In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a North Dakota state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the defendants filed their answer.
  • In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Missouri state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff-appellant filed their reply brief.
  • In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging an Oklahoma state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
  • In one case brought by a trade association of drug manufacturers challenging a Rhode Island state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
  • In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Maine state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court granted the parties’ motion to stay pending resolution of the plaintiff’s appeal.
  • In one case brought by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, a group of amici filed a supplemental amicus curiae brief in support [...]

    Continue Reading



This Week in 340B: September 30 – October 6, 2025

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy

  • In four cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Utah, two plaintiffs filed a response to the government’s notice of supplemental authority, one plaintiff filed a notice of supplemental authority, and one defendant filed a notice of supplemental authority in support of their motion to dismiss.
  • In a case by a drug manufacturer challenging an Arkansas state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the court denied the intervenor-defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings.
  • A trade association for drug manufacturers filed a cases in Oregon and a case in Rhode Island to challenge state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
  • A drug manufacturer filed a case in Maine and a case in Oklahoma to challenge state laws governing contract pharmacy arrangements.
  • In one case by a drug manufacturer challenging a Colorado state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements, the plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction.
  • In one case by a trade association for drug manufacturers challenging a Colorado state law [...]

    Continue Reading



This Week in 340B: September 23 – 29, 2025

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; HRSA Audit Process; Other

  • In two cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Nebraska, the defendant filed a supplemental reply to plaintiff’s response in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
  • In a case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Missouri, amici filed a supplemental brief in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss, defendants filed a reply memorandum in support of defendants’ motion to dismiss, and proposed intervenors filed reply suggestions in support of proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene.
  • In three cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Maine, one plaintiff filed a motion for preliminary injunction and in two cases, the court denied each plaintiff’s motion for preliminary injunction and each plaintiff appealed the decision.
  • In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Colorado, the defendant filed a motion to dismiss.
  • In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Rhode Island, the plaintiff filed [...]

    Continue Reading



This Week in 340B: September 16 – 22, 2025

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; Other; HRSA Audit Process

  • In two cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Missouri, the parties filed an unopposed motion to stay proceedings, which the court granted, and plaintiffs filed memoranda in opposition to proposed intervenors’ motion to intervene and in opposition to defendants’ motion to dismiss.
  • In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Nebraska, the plaintiff filed a brief in opposition to defendant’s motion to dismiss.
  • In three cases challenging a Utah state law, the defendants filed a notice of supplemental authority in support of their motion to dismiss, and the plaintiffs filed response to the notices of supplemental authority.
  • In four cases challenging HRSA’s audit process, the appellate court denied the plaintiff-appellants’ emergency motions for stay or injunction pending appeal.
  • In a case challenging a state law in Tennessee, the plaintiff filed a reply in support of its first amended complaint.
  • In a case by a drug manufacturer against the government, [...]

    Continue Reading



This Week in 340B: September 9 – 15, 2025

Find this week’s updates on 340B litigation to help you stay in the know on how 340B cases are developing across the country. Each week we comb through the dockets of more than 50 340B cases to provide you with a quick summary of relevant updates from the prior week in this industry-shaping body of litigation. Get more details on these 340B cases and all other material 340B cases pending in federal and state courts with the 340B Litigation Tracker.

Issues at Stake: Contract Pharmacy; HRSA Audit Process; Other

  • In a case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Tennessee, the defendant filed a response in opposition to the plaintiff’s amended complaint.
  • In a case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Utah, the defendant filed a notice of supplemental authority.
  • In four cases challenging the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) audit process, the defendant filed an opposition to the plaintiffs’ emergency motions for stay or injunction pending appeal, and the plaintiffs filed a joint reply to the opposition.
  • In two cases challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Nebraska, plaintiffs filed a response to defendant’s supplemental brief.
  • In one case challenging a state law governing contract pharmacy arrangements in Missouri, amici filed a motion for leave to file a supplemental amicus brief in support of defendant’s motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
  • In a case by a covered entity against an insurance company alleging breach of contract, the [...]

    Continue Reading



STAY CONNECTED

TOPICS

ARCHIVES

Chambers 2021 Top Ranked
LEgal 500 EMEA top tier firm 2021
Legal 500 USA top tier firm
U.S. News Law Firm of the Year 2022 Health Care Law